> On 17 Oct 2022, at 7:53 am, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > I think that's because > recursive nameserves effectively have always done an equivalent to "happy > eyeballs", so the risk is low. > That certainly was not the case in 2015: https://www.potaroo.net/presentations/2015-10-04-dns-dual-stack.pdf I have not seen a large scale measurement since then but I suspect that nothing has changed. i.e.: recursive resolvers do not do the equivalent of happy eyeballs behaviour. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-momoka-... Momoka Yamamoto
- Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-mom... Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] New Version Notification f... Momoka Yamamoto
- Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] New Version Notificati... Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] New Version Notifi... Momoka Yamamoto
- Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] New Version Notificati... Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] New Version Notifi... Momoka Yamamoto
- Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] New Version N... Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] [BEHAVE] [v6ops] ... Michael Richardson
- Re: [DNSOP] [BEHAVE] [v6o... Geoff Huston
- Re: [DNSOP] [BEHAVE] [v6o... Michael Richardson
- Re: [DNSOP] [BEHAVE] [v6o... Geoff Huston
- Re: [DNSOP] [BEHAVE] [v6o... Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] New Versi... Momoka Yamamoto