On Aug 24, 2022, at 7:14 PM, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Are you saying that it was explicit after WG Last Call but changed? Or >> during IETF Last Call and was changed? >> > No, I'm saying that, as far as I can tell, the flow was never explicit, and > that's a big part of the problem. > > And I'm saying that if it had been explicit, the concerns would have been > raised at that time, rather than now. This WG has dealt with that exact issue many times with well-debated -bis documents. When Warren started this thread, he said "this is *not* an opportunity to re-litigate existing decisions, make non-required changes, etc." AliasMode was significantly discussed during the preparation of the document, and it appears that you don't like the conclusion. That's fine, but that's not a reason to change this document: it is a reason to create either a document that clarifies or updates it. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
