ULA is no different. "its private addressing" except when ip6.arpa
shows that people are trying to use it, to the outside world. Lots of
great theories about things break .. when they meet the DNS.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 1:17 PM John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
>
> It appears that Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> said:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >as someone who looks at lots of caching resolver logs, you could add .local
> >to this.
> >But even those query loads are not what I consider a problem .
>
> It's not the query loads, it's the data leakage. I gather that the stuff
> that leaks out to public DNS .CORP queries is quite amazing.
>
> R's,
> John
>
> >On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 11:06 PM John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> >
> >> It appears that Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> said:
> >> >Works for whom? I think it's entirely possible for the GNU
> >> >people to come up with something they think works that does
> >> >not break anything. Personally, I'm not convinced they're
> >> >right about the first part, but I'm happy enough about the
> >> >second.
> >>
> >> Depends how you feel about .GNS queries escaping into the
> >> real DNS when they don't anticipate all of the ways people
> >> will use their stuff.
> >>
> >> Dunno if they think that's a problem ("you need to configure
> >> your software right") but I am pretty sure that people who
> >> have seen what leaks from .CORP and .HOME believe it would be
> >> a big problem.
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
