On 8/8/2022 2:03 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
So, just to be clear, I'm approving all of these errata, yes?
As I noted privately, there is a history with this list of RFC references that demonstrates something akin to whimsy, but, at the least indicating a lack of a clear and shared basis for deciding what reference to use.
So, for example, why is this latest reference correct this time, when it was judged incorrect, the last time is was used for the entry?
That makes it impossible to know whether this latest change really is correct. This time.
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
