On 14:02 22/03, Ralf Weber wrote: > Moin! > > So to follow up on my comment in the working group on registries not having > anything to do with it. I understand that this drafts is for authoritative > name server implementers, however I think that we should make clear that an > authoritative name server not answering correct by this draft might do so > because it does not have sufficient data. > > So we currently have in the introduction: > > Note that this document only clarifies requirements of name server > software implementations. It does not place any requirements on data > placed in DNS zones or registries. > > how about adding: > > However missing data might make it impossible for a name server to answer > with the correct (referral) glue data. > > And maybe add some encouragement or referral ;-) to work that has to be done > elsewhere. >
The problem is with SIBLING glue records. The in-domain glues are of course required and included in the zone. Hugo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
