On 12. 11. 21 15:26, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 12:59:42PM +0100,
Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote
a message of 24 lines which said:
I don't want to speak for them (I don't know if they are on this
list, but they definitely are on ADD) but in past discussions around
this concept they recognized its potential usefulness (apart maybe
from a specific browser which seems to have a principle stance
against DNS filters) but were concerned about the security of the
mechanism, i.e. the risk that it could be used to present to the
user a phishing or misleading page,
Moreover, I have serious doubts that DNS configuration errors could be
meaningfully reported to end users. It would be very difficult to make
them understandable and, since we deal with errors in authoritative
servers, the client could not do anything, anyway.
I have nothing against informing users (some will find that useful)
but we should focus on reporting to the zone manager, not to the
client.
Seems like you are talking about a different document? Or are you
suggesting the document to be dropped entirely because it goes in a
completely wrong direction?
--
Petr Špaček
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
