> Il 10/11/2021 17:17 Petr Špaček <pspa...@isc.org> ha scritto: > > 1. Input from browser vendors > ----------------------------- > I believe we really really _really_ need input from end-client vendors, > most importantly Google Chrome and Safari. Is there any indication that > they might be interested? If not, why?
I don't want to speak for them (I don't know if they are on this list, but they definitely are on ADD) but in past discussions around this concept they recognized its potential usefulness (apart maybe from a specific browser which seems to have a principle stance against DNS filters) but were concerned about the security of the mechanism, i.e. the risk that it could be used to present to the user a phishing or misleading page, either by an attacker or by the network itself, with the risk of the user not realizing that this is not their intended destination but a page generated by someone else. This explains many of the restrictions and requirements in the document, including the restriction to encrypted DNS connections. -- Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
