On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 11:24 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: > So, the question: what's the right FINAL value to put in the draft > before LC?
I don't know what the -right- value is, but I know what I want: 0 iterations, empty salt, otherwise the NSEC3 gets ignored, presumably leading to SERVFAIL. This removes the 'insecure' window completely. So, I'll support any push to lower the numbers. Editorial nit, already hinted at above: the text currently has "Validating resolvers MAY return SERVFAIL when processing NSEC3 records with iterations larger than 500." - I suggest changing this to "validating resolvers MAY ignore NSEC3 records with iterations larger than 500". That way, zones in the middle of a transition from 1000 to 0 iterations do not get punished. Zones at 1000, not in a transition, will still get SERVFAIL by virtue of the NSEC3 proof missing (because it is ignored). Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
