Good folks,
I think that draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance is fairly well boiled, so I'm asking for a last call on moving toward a last call. The draft is intentionally short and to the point but at the same time we've waited a while to see what the industry would do with the guidance. Viktor's recent measurements have very much shown acceptance of the document as a whole, and certainly of the proposed 150 iteration cap. But, as Viktor indicated in his posts, we could move even lower (100 being the next obvious step, but even lower is possible to still retain a reasonable percentage). But there is of course a risk of we'll never get to a definitive value, and may operators by constantly lowering it and they have to keep changing values. So, the question: what's the right FINAL value to put in the draft before LC? -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
