Moin! On 28 Jul 2021, at 18:03, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Ralf Weber wrote: >>> First, as Mark said, sibling glue is sometimes needed. >> It is only needed for broken circular dependancies, which we don’t care >> about. > > They are not broken until you decide "we don't care about" :) I don’t think I was the only one ;-). > We will look at improving the wording in the draft. The draft is not > about changing the rules of glue - we just thought to include some of > it to help implementers and to help explain why it is important to set > TC=1 even if you think it is harmless to not include some or all glue. That is something I can agree to. If the glues you as an authoritative server want to put in a UDP packet don’t fit you SHOULD or MUST set TC=1. However adding sibling glue is optional, but MUST in the current draft. So long -Ralf ——- Ralf Weber _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
