All

The 26th has come and gone, and we've seen some cleanup in the updated
text, and the authors have uploaded a new version.
The chairs are calling the WGLC done, and I will start the shepherd process
later today.

Authors, thanks for your patience.

tim


On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:20 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Paul
>
> Thanks for the updated version.    For those at home, the diffs are
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-07&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-08
>
> The Chairs would like the working group to review these changes.  We're
> looking for comments
> before Monday April 26th.
>
> thanks
> tim
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 7:15 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Greetings again. We have posted a very delayed version
>> draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis that we believe answers all of the issues
>> brought up during WG last call. There are a lot of significant changes from
>> the previous version.
>>
>> Everyone (but particularly resolver developers): please review the
>> document carefully, particularly the algorithm in Section 3, to see if it
>> matches what you expect.
>>
>> Chairs: please consider either having another WG last call, or at least
>> waiting for a bit before moving this to IETF last call so that we can get
>> careful reviews.
>>
>> --Paul Hoffman, for the authors
>> team_______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to