> -----Original Message-----
> From: DNSOP <dnsop-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 7:15 PM
> To: DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [DNSOP] New version of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis
> after WG last call
>
> Greetings again. We have posted a very delayed version draft-ietf-dnsop-
> rfc7816bis that we believe answers all of the issues brought up during WG
> last call. There are a lot of significant changes from the previous version.
>
> Everyone (but particularly resolver developers): please review the document
> carefully, particularly the algorithm in Section 3, to see if it matches what 
> you
> expect.

Thanks for the update! I have a few minor suggestions after re-reading the 
draft.

Section 1.1: "Academic research has been performed on QNAME minimisation 
[devries-qnamemin].  This work shows that QNAME minimisation in relaxed mode 
causes almost no problems." It would be helpful to note the issues that the 
paper described, perhaps as follows:

"This work shows that QNAME minimisation in relaxed made causes almost no 
problems; some of the issues that have been observed are described in Section 
5."

Section 5: It's worth noting the performance issues reported in 
[devries-qnamemin]. Suggestion:

OLD:
QNAME minimisation can increase the number of queries based on the incoming 
QNAME.  This is described in Section 2.3.

NEW:
QNAME minimisation can increase the number of queries based on the incoming 
QNAME.  This is described in Section 2.3. As described in [devries-qnamemin], 
QNAME minimisation in strict mode both increases the number of DNS lookups by 
up to 26% and leads to up to 5% more failed lookups. The full cache in a 
production resolver will soften that overhead.

Scott

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to