On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 5:16 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:56 PM Brian Dickson < > brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think this is another point in favor of doing QNAME minimization. >> RFC7816 (technically experimental, but recommended.) >> >> It kind of makes the query order moot; the resolver looks up the shorter >> name first even while resolving the longer name. >> > > Is there any data or even a hint of how widely that experiment has been > deployed or implemented? > It's on by default in (recent versions of) a number of popular open source DNS resolver implementations (BIND, Unbound, Knot). Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
