In article <yblr1w438fb....@w7.hardakers.net> you write: >Yep, I suspect some of the bigger TLDs probably couldn't opt in to this >draft simply because they're full of, um, "history". Until that history >is cleaned, they probably couldn't deploy it.
It's not just history. All of the nominet TLDs and many Verisign TLDs have signed A records that are clearly deliberate. There's also a fair number of TXT records named zz--zz.<domain> that have some sort of info about when the zone was updated. I think it's benign to allow any sort of record as an immediate child of the domain, since you need to go two levels down for split zones. That handes the nominet and zz--zz cases. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
