My understanding of the draft is that it attempts to prevent a key to sign a RRset it is not necessarily authoritative for. I think the WG should work on this, and support adoption of the draft. I am happy to review further version of the draft. Yours, Daniel
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:27 PM Wes Hardaker <wjh...@hardakers.net> wrote: > Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> writes: > > > On Apr 27, 2020, at 18:28, Wes Hardaker <wjh...@hardakers.net> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the comments. I'm working on a more clear rewrite of the > > > introduction. I'd love your feedback on it once I get it wrapped up. > > > > Yes, for sure! Happy to do that. > > Half done. Either tonight or tomorrow. > -- > Wes Hardaker > USC/ISI > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
