On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:14:26PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:04 AM Vittorio Bertola
> <vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Il 22/04/2020 19:15 Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> ha 
> > > scritto:
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > DISCUSS:
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Sections 4.16 and 4.17 have some discussion that suggests that the
> > > respective extended errors apply only to the current "local hop" of a DNS
> > > query, and thus should not be propagated by a resolver/forwarder as part 
> > > of
> > > a response.  If so, this would be at odds with the discussion in Section 3
> > > that leaves such bhavior as merely "implementation dependent" (giving some
> > > MAY-level options).  I'm not sure what the intent is, here, so let's talk
> > > about whether there's anything that should change.
> >
> > Indeed, thinking at the possible use case for those error codes, it would 
> > make sense for the forwarder to forward them to the final user. Perhaps we 
> > can fix the language to make this clear? E.g., instead or "the server being 
> > directly talked to", "the server actually resolving the queries" or 
> > something like that?
> 
> Hah! Wes and I spent some time yesterday trying to figure out how best
> to answer this, and ended up with two ideas:
> 1: just remove the "being directly talked to":
> "The server is unable to respond to the request because the domain is
> blacklisted due to an internal security policy imposed by the operator
> of the server being directly talked to." -> "The server is unable to
> respond to the request because the domain isblacklisted due to an
> internal security policy imposed by the operator of the server"
> or 2: some very convoluted text...
> 
> In my view your proposed text is simple, clear, and addresses the issue...

I think it would address my concern as well ... plus all that other stuff
:)

-Ben

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to