> Il 22/04/2020 19:15 Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> ha
> scritto:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Sections 4.16 and 4.17 have some discussion that suggests that the
> respective extended errors apply only to the current "local hop" of a DNS
> query, and thus should not be propagated by a resolver/forwarder as part of
> a response. If so, this would be at odds with the discussion in Section 3
> that leaves such bhavior as merely "implementation dependent" (giving some
> MAY-level options). I'm not sure what the intent is, here, so let's talk
> about whether there's anything that should change.
Indeed, thinking at the possible use case for those error codes, it would make
sense for the forwarder to forward them to the final user. Perhaps we can fix
the language to make this clear? E.g., instead or "the server being directly
talked to", "the server actually resolving the queries" or something like that?
--
Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
