The Call for Adoption period has ended and DNSOP has adopted the document. Thanks for all the comments (and calling me out on failing to read the current version. I am chastised). The Working Group will get to work through the terms in this draft as we move it forward.
thanks Tim On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:12 PM Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: > On Aug 2, 2019, at 10:59, Töma Gavrichenkov <xima...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > And while we're at it, doesn't it make sense to (kinda proactively) > > include some potential transports in the draft (like DoQ) to avoid RFC > > one-liners in future? Even only to note later that those didn't see > > widespread adoption afterwards. > > I think for the sake of all of our sanity our terminology documents > should describe observed usage, not make speculative decisions on what > to call things that nobody has yet needed a name for. > > > Joe >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
