despite my comments at the microphone, +1 for adoption. I think this
is good work and should be closed out.

"and I still don't like do53"

-G

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 2:09 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Back in 2014, we started with "DNS Terminology" which became RFC7719
> Then In 2016, this became a BCP version of "DNS Terminology" which is now 
> RFC8499
>
> Now, in 2109, there is a request to include additional terms to reflect
> the new transports DNS is being used over.    There is still discussion over
> whether all these terms make sense, but the underlying need exists.
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-ter
>
> The draft is available here: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-ter/
>
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
> by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>
> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
>
> This call for adoption ends: 15 August 2019
>
> Thanks,
> tim wicinski
> DNSOP co-chair
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to