> On 22 Jul 2019, at 21:52, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > > apparently ECS creates problems for privacy, but _how could we have > suspected_? IIRC the ECS privacy issues were recognised at the time. They lost out to the argument that CDNs were already doing (or about to do) ECS and it would be better (for some definition of better) if this was done in a way that had an RFC behind it. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance Study at... Kevin Borgolte
- Re: [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance... Rob Sayre
- Re: [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Perform... Kevin Borgolte
- Re: [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Per... Rob Sayre
- Re: [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load... Kevin Borgolte
- Re: [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page... Rob Sayre
- Re: [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH... Puneet Sood
- Re: [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] Do53 vs DoT vs... Livingood, Jason
- Re: [DNSOP] [Add] [dns-privacy] Do5... Andrew Campling
- Re: [DNSOP] [Add] [dns-privacy]... Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] [Add] [dn... Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] [Add] [dn... Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] Do53 vs DoT vs... Willem Toorop
- Re: [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Per... Rob Sayre