On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:20 AM Tommy Jensen <jensen.tho...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> The link you shared indicates the problem is RC4, which was removed from > TLS in 1.3 for this very reason. This doesn’t demonstrate TLS 1.3 is > vulnerable; it demonstrates why adopting TLS 1.3 is so important. > Yeah, that's one part of it, but some of the other approaches described are more general. thanks, Rob > > Thanks, > Tommy > ------------------------------ > *From:* DNSOP <dnsop-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Rob Sayre < > say...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 8:46:42 AM > *To:* Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> > *Cc:* dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>; Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> > *Subject:* Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: [Add] new draft: > draft-grover-add-policy-detection-00 > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 6:41 AM Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > > > > The certs are public information, so having the certs isn't useful. Can > you please be clearer about the attack you are describing? > > > Sure, here's an article about it: > < > https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/09/06/nsa_cryptobreaking_bullrun_analysis/ > <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theregister.co.uk%2F2013%2F09%2F06%2Fnsa_cryptobreaking_bullrun_analysis%2F&data=02%7C01%7CJensen.Thomas%40microsoft.com%7C496a0b49339349ac921308d70a04e0de%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636988888386522988&sdata=SbICd7%2FtkDlhh1zyusjw75CRgg6KHhbpzH0Efn%2BoBew%3D&reserved=0> > > > > Do you have any thoughts on that? > > thanks, > Rob >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
