Hi Witold, On Jul 8, 2019, at 16:05, Witold Krecicki <w...@isc.org> wrote:
W dniu 08.07.2019 o 19:20, Wessels, Duane pisze: > One more thing - this feature is intended for operators, not for regular > users. We should have more tolerance for shootfooting features there. I don't have anything extra to add to my earlier observations and I understand in general the points you are making. One small thing though, on your text above -- I'm not sure precisely what you mean by those words, but it seems possible that you're distinguishing between large, commercial DNS service operators and others who might be smaller, non-commercial, hobbyist, amateur, or something. I think we should be careful about specifications that appear to promote centralisation or otherwise make assumptions about what particular kinds of operators can or will do. I think our audience includes the full spectrum. (I also don't think small, hobbyist operators have any kind of monopoly on operational accidents, having been involved in more than a couple large-scale events in my time.) If we can design protocols that can fail in a safe way, I think we should, regardless of whether we imagine safety shoes are being worn. Joe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
