I believe this has been in a bit stall for some time. I'm finally trying push for some real production implementations.
I have one note that I wrote when I was initially reading the draft: - Canonical RR Form comes from RFC 4034 s. 6.2 and it doesn't require require normalization of SPF and CAA records. RFC 6844 specifically allows any string formatting allowed by https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1035#section-5.1 Not sure if there is any real issue with this one but in theory I guess there could be functionally equivalent records with a digest mismatch. Maybe it's even desirable that those are not normalized, just a note. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
