[[ GAAAAH. The abstract of the draft says it should be discussed on the ADD
list. That's wrong, it belongs here. ]]
[[ GAAAAH2. I didn't include the draft info.
Title : DNS Resolver Information Self-publication
Authors : Puneet Sood
Roy Arends
Paul Hoffman
Filename : draft-sah-resolver-information-00.txt
Pages : 9
Date : 2019-04-30 ]]
Greetings again. Puneet, Roy and I have just published a -00 with an idea for
how to get information about a recursive resolver from the resolver, if it
wants to give that information. This is an outgrowth of my earlier work in the
DOH WG on draft-ietf-doh-resolver-associated-doh. The discussion on that latter
draft in Prague had a couple of people saying "this should be more general than
just DoH" and "what about DoT", which sparked the idea for
draft-sah-resolver-information.
Note as you read this document that we have *not* started filling in the kind
of information that a resolver might return; we haven't even specified the DoH
stuff. We wanted to be sure that DNSOP folks thought that the direction here
might be viable; if so, I'll write an associated draft for a resolver's
associated DoH and DoT servers, and some of you might start writing drafts for
other ideas.
Also note that this is explicitly only for resolvers; we might later do a
second protocol for authoritative servers who want to give information about
themselves (such as if they do DoT, if that moves forward in DPRIVE). The
reason for the split is that a resolver that doesn't know the protocol here
might pass the query on to the authoritative servers for the root or .arpa, and
the response to the stub would then be ambiguous.
We look forward to your bashing and/or support.
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop