I support adoption and note that since the draft already has an early code point allocation there really isn’t any strong argument for not adopting it anymore. The code point is lost, so we might as well make it as good as possible :)
Sent from mobile device > On Mar 10, 2019, at 15:31, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The chairs feel the document has been updated to address > several issues raised from the last meeting, including > some implementations. > > If there is pushback during this call for adoption, we can > take the topic up in Prague. > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by > DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > This call for adoption ends: 24 March 2019 > > Thanks, > tim wicinski > DNSOP co-chair > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
