I support adoption. I can see some good use cases for this and I have previously worked on a proprietary implementation achieving similar goals to those that are mentioned in the draft.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 3:32 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The chairs feel the document has been updated to address > several issues raised from the last meeting, including > some implementations. > > If there is pushback during this call for adoption, we can > take the topic up in Prague. > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > This call for adoption ends: 24 March 2019 > > Thanks, > tim wicinski > DNSOP co-chair > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
