Hashes save space once the rdata is bigger than the hash. -- Mark Andrews
> On 22 Feb 2019, at 02:12, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Feb 21, 2019, at 6:11 AM, Dick Franks <[email protected]> wrote: >> A more radical approach would be to have just one hash per item per record. > > One way to make this document less complex yet just as useful would be to > simply have a record that contains what is to be deleted, rather than a hash > of what is to be deleted. It’s not at all clear to me that there’s value in > using the hash—to me it just seems to create uncertainty. > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
