On Feb 21, 2019, at 6:11 AM, Dick Franks <[email protected]> wrote: > A more radical approach would be to have just one hash per item per record.
One way to make this document less complex yet just as useful would be to simply have a record that contains what is to be deleted, rather than a hash of what is to be deleted. It’s not at all clear to me that there’s value in using the hash—to me it just seems to create uncertainty.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
