I once write a full resolve that checked both sides of every delegation point and remembered both sets of ns records. It would not have followed an ns to a non-soa. That would not be wrong.
On Dec 28, 2018, 14:27, at 14:27, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: >In article ><[email protected]> you >write: >>Both work perfectly fine. named-compilezone produces the expected >lines. >> >>1.localhost. 604800 IN CNAME 1.bob.example.net. >>2.localhost. 604800 IN CNAME 2.bob.example.net. >>3.localhost. 604800 IN CNAME 3.bob.example.net. >>4.localhost. 604800 IN CNAME 4.bob.example.net. >>5.localhost. 604800 IN NS ns1.example.com. >>6.localhost. 604800 IN NS ns1.example.com. >>7.localhost. 604800 IN NS ns1.example.com. >>8.localhost. 604800 IN NS ns1.example.com. >> >>Which of the two methods above is easier (or poses fewer questions) to > >>understand by someone who's not familiar with BIND, much less >$GENERATE? > >I'd think it depends whether invalid delegations bother them, like if, >say, ns1.example.com might not be running BIND. > >R's, >John > >_______________________________________________ >DNSOP mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
