In article <2f50b5bd-ea7d-8009-f207-cce3cddf3...@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> you write: >Both work perfectly fine. named-compilezone produces the expected lines. > >1.localhost. 604800 IN CNAME 1.bob.example.net. >2.localhost. 604800 IN CNAME 2.bob.example.net. >3.localhost. 604800 IN CNAME 3.bob.example.net. >4.localhost. 604800 IN CNAME 4.bob.example.net. >5.localhost. 604800 IN NS ns1.example.com. >6.localhost. 604800 IN NS ns1.example.com. >7.localhost. 604800 IN NS ns1.example.com. >8.localhost. 604800 IN NS ns1.example.com. > >Which of the two methods above is easier (or poses fewer questions) to >understand by someone who's not familiar with BIND, much less $GENERATE?
I'd think it depends whether invalid delegations bother them, like if, say, ns1.example.com might not be running BIND. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
