Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > > Because of the experience with homenet, I actually sort of disagree with > you about needing a general solution for this. I think that the general > solution for this is not to do it.
:-) I was thinking more of "generally within the corporate context" - homenet is (as you say) much more of a challenge. Within the corporate context I think the general solution is to make this part of the managed machine configuration (along with X.509 trust anchors, etc.), i.e. don't specify the "internal" configuration details in-band, but just give the client some kind of name for a collection of configuration settings it should already have. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Southeast Biscay: Southerly or southwesterly 4 or 5, occasionally 6 in north. Moderate or rough becoming rough or very rough. Mainly fair. Good. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
