On 11/20/18 8:42 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Nov 20, 2018, at 6:09 PM, Adam Roach <a...@nostrum.com> wrote:
ยง5:
o CBOR is an IETF standard and familiar to IETF participants. It is
While CBOR is standards-track, it's nowhere near standard yet. Suggest:
"...is an IETF specification..." (See BCP 9)
The CBOR WG is actively working on moving CBOR to Internet Standard, so "nowhere
near" feels overstated.
This is, of course, somewhat subjective and not really worth arguing
over, but I think it's defensible when talking about a document that
isn't even an RFC yet.
If you are trying to get the wording in this draft correct by BCP 9, the correction
should be to "... is a Proposed Standard...".
That won't age well.
/a
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
