On Nov 20, 2018, at 6:09 PM, Adam Roach <a...@nostrum.com> wrote: > > ยง5: > >> o CBOR is an IETF standard and familiar to IETF participants. It is > > While CBOR is standards-track, it's nowhere near standard yet. Suggest: > "...is an IETF specification..." (See BCP 9)
The CBOR WG is actively working on moving CBOR to Internet Standard, so "nowhere near" feels overstated. If you are trying to get the wording in this draft correct by BCP 9, the correction should be to "... is a Proposed Standard...". --Paul Hoffman (who still finds it weird to be the co-author of CBOR)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
