Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems Date: Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 04:39:09PM +0000 Quoting Tony Finch (d...@dotat.at): > It's really good to see more discussion about ANAME.
I agree. > I think a resolver-side or client-side alternative (like the various > web-specific record types we have been discussing) is defintely soemthing > we should aim for in the long term, but that isn't what this work is > about. IMNSHO _any_ work on "fixing CNAMES at apex" that gets traction is a spanner in the works for what we seem to agree is a better solution. A interim fix will be deployed and stall every attempt at DTRT. I am well aware of "perfect being the enemy of good enough" but I'm not certain DNAME is "good enough". -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE SA0XLR +46 705 989668 Now KEN and BARBIE are PERMANENTLY ADDICTED to MIND-ALTERING DRUGS ...
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
