Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't quite understand why it was seen as beneficial by the group that this doc has been split up, however, BCP does not seems adequate for this part of the doc anymore (maybe PS instead as it updates some PS docs?). Also, I think that the OLD/NEW style is not really necessary in most cases as simply a sentence/reference to the registry is added. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
