Erik Nygren wrote:
... This ambiguity in the current specifications results in this mismatch between the pedantic (rrsets are explicitly unordered, and a consistent order is a subset of that) and the current reality (applications and services rely on resolvers-at-scale to be explicitly inconsistent in the ordering of rrsets) is why I started off by proposing that we may need a BCP or informational RFC that describes the currently assumed defaults and best-practices (ie, round-robin is assumed in many places so don't consistently order at-scale by default).
i am +1 to this view, which is why i didn't suggest you move it to bind-workers@.
-- P Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
