> On Jun 15, 2018, at 2:01 PM, Peter van Dijk <peter.van.d...@powerdns.com> > wrote: > > Hello Andrew, > > On 15 Jun 2018, at 19:12, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > >> I believe that RRsets are unordered sets by definition. So I supect >> that if people are relying on the order in which they come off the >> wire, they're making a mistake. > > This. One hundred million times, this.
Yes, so because they’re unordered, they could also be ordered, and that should be seen as a version of unordered vs strictly ordered. Just because the last 10m times I asked it came in the same order doesn’t mean that for 10m+1 it will be or should be. I’m reminded of some large content providers telling me how they routed their ICMP bits differently than their non-ICMP because they had dedicated hosts to just respond to the ICMP requests of www.example.com folks used as a measurement point to see if their connectivity was working :-) - Jared _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
