On 11 Jun 2018, at 12:43, Job Snijders wrote:
For what it's worth - all my concerns have been addressed.
+1 to Job's feeling.
I believe
the document to be in good shape now and would support a progression
through WG LC.
....except that we already went through WG Last Call.
The changes to the document are large, but it is not clear to me that
enough people are reading them to warrant another WG Last Call before
sending it to the IETF Last Call.
I appreciate the effort the authors have put into
making this an exemplary specification!
+1 again.
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
