I'd like to see something similar to what was done with HTTP (cf. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-1 ), in which one or two foundational documents lay out the core concepts and data structures and then cross-link with others that flesh out more specialized aspects with an intent to preserving comprehensibility as things evolve (e.g., defining client, resolver, and authoritative server behavior pertaining to the same purpose in the same document with the expectation that changes like EDNS, EDNS options, and DNSSEC will affect them together).

I am also willing to participate in such an effort.


On 04/01/2018 05:51 PM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:


On 31 March 2018 at 17:34, bert hubert <bert.hub...@powerdns.com <mailto:bert.hub...@powerdns.com>> wrote:

    First, I agree it is necessary. I don't think anyone would really
    disagree.
    The issue is the stupendous amount of work it would be and if we
    are going
    to do it.

    A secondary question is how hard we are going to make this on
    ourselves if
    we do it. This comprises a number of things: 1) which RFCs would
    be obsoleted
    by the rewrite (2181?)and which ones are we going to leave in
    place (403x?)

    2) What 'optional' things are we going to move into scope of DNS
    basics. In
    other words, what will 1034/1035-bis say about DNSSEC?


I think that's another question of organization in here too, which is whether the document is operations or implementation, and if it's implementation what part of the architecture is being implemented (e.g. client, server, authority, recursion, ...).

I can't decide whether it makes more sense to split up things like stubs, full resolvers, or authoritative servers into separate documents, or to try to describe the whole beast in one document like 1035 did.  But, for the core, I'm leaning toward the former.



_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_dnsop&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=-o8MJF7i0TzXAJRB0ncfTVfWKSyTG7nl_iTLU_A2B7c&m=KCMaykGkoSDoh1eUUzUUET6wMGHCiDHvTIsdLKul6sk&s=GO61zxKm4_ZtgzXT3lz_56L_8uzVWuhO4IKQ0SV74-g&e=

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to