Ondřej Surý wrote: > It’s interesting that there’s some NULL RR Type usage in your zones, I > suppose that some experiments.
Whatever the long gone original experiments that NULL was intended for that are alluded to in STD 13, NULL has some present day operational utility in that it's explicitly defined as carrying as much arbitrary data as can fit, and NULL RRs can be used with RFC 3597 generic syntax without squatting on a code point. It has no presentation format and is not allowed in master zone files so presumably it is also the easiest RR type to implement. -- Robert Edmonds _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop