Evan Hunt <e...@isc.org> wrote: > > These RR types have text representations and wire format representations, > which from a complexity standpoint seem quite harmless to implement. There > are the old annoying rules about name compression and sorting, which do add > some complexity, but are already implemented in all the existing codebases.
There's the particularly special case of WKS which has weird collision logic - RFC 2136 section 3.4.2.2. It's extra weird that this was specified in 1997 when WKS was deprecated in 1989 - RFC 1101 and RFC 1123. I fear that this will make it hard to delete WKS code because that may introduce interop bugs if a new server bindly allows colliding WKS records that an old server objects to. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode Irish Sea: South 4, increasing 5 to 7, then veering west later. Slight or moderate. Rain at times. Good, occasionally poor. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
