On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Petr Špaček <petr.spa...@nic.cz> wrote: > > > On 6.2.2018 17:13, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> On 6 Feb 2018, at 8:04, Petr Špaček wrote: >> >>> On 6.2.2018 13:22, Tony Finch wrote: >>>> A. Schulze <s...@andreasschulze.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yes, "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-NNNN" is more descriptive and specific. >>>>> I also prefer that longer variant. >>>> >>>> Yes, more friendly for web searches if someone is wondering about weird >>>> queries. >>> >>> Bonus points if we can get a number reserved by RFC editor, it would >>> allow us to use name like >>> test-rfc0000-is-ta-NNNN >>> test-rfc0000-not-ta-NNNN >>> >>> That would be super awesome. >> >> ...and super-unlikely, given the history of the RFC Series. >> >>> Is something like RFC number pre-allocation possible? >> >> Sometimes (rarely), after Working Group Last Call. That's why I >> suggested "kskroll-sentinel" since those words are in the WG draft name, >> and will probably appear in the IETF Datatracker forever. > > Fine. Now we need to have something actionable, e.g. set of names for > Geoff to test. > > Can we have couple proposals and test them in one go, so results are > comparable? > > I've gathered these: > > kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-NNNN > kskroll-sentinel-not-ta-NNNN > is-ta--NNNN > not-ta--NNNN > > I propose longer but more descriptive variant: > kskroll-sentinel-dnssec-root-trust-anchor-key-trusted-yes-NNN > kskroll-sentinel-dnssec-root-trust-anchor-key-trusted-no-NNNN > > (I imagine that real meaning of name "kskroll-sentinel" will be known by > dozen people but hunders or thousands people will encounter it in > tcpdump, so why not make life easier for them. It costs almost nothing...) > > Do we have other proposals? > > -- > Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
-- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
