On 5 Feb 2018, at 11:18, Geoff Huston wrote:
On 5 Feb 2018, at 11:47 pm, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote:
Geoff Huston <g...@apnic.net> wrote:
if not underscores and IF “xm—“ as a leading substring is not
acceptable for
some reason, then what label format would be acceptable for this
measure?
Maybe put the -- in the middle somewhere? e.g. is-ta--NNNN
not-ta—NNNN
I thought this was due to some concern over the wording in RFC
<mumble>(some IDN
RFC whose number I can’t recall right now!) over a comment that the
UC label
should not contain the starting sequence "<letter> <letter> - -”
Is there a broader concern over the use of double hypens in labels in
hostname
contexts in the DNS?
Not from me. I think Tony's idea is likely fine, but I also think
kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-NNNN is perfectly fine as well.
--Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
