I think we're rat holing. I'm not an author on this draft, but I know them both, and I work with one, and I believe the draft is basically in the right space and .. well.. we're rat holing.
So, noting my disclaimer of bias, can we .. move on? Is there real matters of substance left on this one? It feels like its close. -G On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:51 AM, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:42:15AM -0500, Joe Abley wrote: >> >> I realise that the following is not what anybody means in this thread > > Hmm. Actually, I wasn't sure :-) > >> I probably missed some. Anyway, I think when people are saying "address >> record" here they actually mean "IP address record". >> > > We should probably say that, then, and also of course we should fix > the poor text in the teminology document to point this out. > > A > > -- > Andrew Sullivan > a...@anvilwalrusden.com > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
