[About -00] Excellent idea, I strongly support the project.
I intend to use it to register 451 for DNS censorship <https://labs.ripe.net/Members/stephane_bortzmeyer/dns-censorship-dns-lies-seen-by-atlas-probes>, following RFC 7725. (I'm serious.) > This document discusses extended *errors*, but it has been suggested > that this could be used to also annotate *non- error* messages. The > authors do not think that this is a good idea, but could be > persuaded otherwise. Why is it a bad idea? I would appreciate some elaboration. > It can be included in any error response (SERVFAIL, NXDOMAIN, > REFUSED, etc) It can be argued that NODATA (pseudo rcode, I know) is an "error" as well as NXDOMAIN... > Usually attached to SERVFAIL messages. This raises an interesting point. Should extended error codes be limited to a specific rcode? For instance "Extended error code 100 MUST be used only with SERVFAIL"? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
