Just quickly go through the draft.
One question: Is it worthwhile to let sub-resolver to know that the answer is stale. It is true that “stale bread is better than no bread” on the recursive server’s point of view. But it may be not true for sub-resolver or measurement probes . The user may want to be more informative. They may have alterative recursive servers or other resolution path ( some apps have their own resolution path) . I have this thought analogous to buying a sushi in 7&11 shop. I pay attention to the <http://dict.youdao.com/w/expiration%20time/#keyfrom=E2Ctranslation> expiration time. I think I need to know it. Davey 发件人: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 tjw ietf 发送时间: 2017年9月6日 3:26 收件人: dnsop 主题: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-tale-dnsop-serve-stale August is over and my self-imposed holiday is over, so it's time to get busy again. We have this document marked as a candidate for adoption. This starts a formal Call for Adoption for draft-tale-dnsop-serve-stale The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tale-dnsop-serve-stale/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. *If You have already stated your position for or against adoption, we are counting those so you do not need to repeat yourself. * This call for adoption ends: 19 September 2017 Thanks, tim wicinski DNSOP co-chair
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
