On 10.8.2017 07:24, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:36:24PM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote: > >> deal with that fully, in a single spec produced an especially confused >> draft, roughly 10 years ago. > > I _think_ I may be one of the people who complained at the time, and > if I recall correctly what Dave and I agreed about (maybe the only > thing) was that this was all a terrible mess that needed repair. At > the time, I was still too much in thrall to data-theoretic approaches > to give in on Dave's pragmatic answer. And I now see that Dave has > actually described better than I was ever able my objection: > >> I've come to the conclusion that "accommodating" the established >> registration practices is a fundamentally wrong path. The only way to solve >> a problem of multiple registration authorities is to create a single >> registration authority. > > Yes. > >> 1. Have this document define the simple, sole, authoritative mechanism >> for registering "top-level" (global scope) underscore names. >> >> 2. Create a separate document that specifies modifications to the SRV and >> URI documents, rationalizing the use of underscore names, through the >> mechanism defined in -attrleaf-. > > I like this approach.
Definitelly! -- Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
