On 8/4/2017 9:02 AM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
Do I understand correctly that the intent is to obsolete existing
underscore registries (whether they be actual IANA registries, or just
code points listed in a draft) and move their data to a new, central
registry? This seems sensible to me.
Arguably, there aren't any underscore registries. There are some specs
that allocate underscore names, but a 'registery' per se is not
specified anywhere. That's the motivation for the current draft.
SRV does registration-by-inheritance, but that overloads one registry
semantic with another.
So I'll take the liberty of rephrasing what you describe as:
Obsolete the existing inheritance registrations and create
explicit registrations for the currently-inherited names in use.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
