El 16 ag 2017, a les 0:19, Lanlan Pan <abby...@gmail.com> va escriure: > We analyzed our recursive query log, about 18.6 billion queries from > 12/01/2015 to 12/07/2015. > We found about 4.7 Million temporary domains occupy the recursive's cache, > which are subdomain wildcards from Skype, QQ, Mcafee, Microsoft, 360safedns, > Cloudfront, Greencompute... > > Temporary Domain Names/ All Names: 41.7% > > Queries for Temporary Domain Names/ All Queries: 0.12%
Okay. So it sounds like you have an algorithm for detecting temporary domain names. It seems to me that a quicker solution to your problem is to publish an operational document describing that algorithm and proposing ways that recursive caches can use it to prune such domains from the cache early. I'm curious if you studied the behavior of existing recursive caches in the presence of these domains: do they in fact cache at the rate you predict they will? The reason I ask is that I know that my own company's cache, which is widely deployed in the exact scenario you are describing, has a pretty sophisticated set of heuristics for deciding what to cache. It would surprise me if it exhibited the behavior you are concerned about. BTW, your paper is behind a paywall, so please don't cite it as a reason to do anything in the IETF. If you want the IETF to take action based on what is in the paper, you need to publish it openly.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
