> -----Original Message----- > From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:34:48PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > > This basically means that BULK is a master-only feature, which implies > > that there's no need for BULK to work across zone transfers, which > > implies the need to standardize it for interop is almost nonexistent. > > I don't think that follows. > > The DNS market is, like the mail market did some while ago, > undergoing a period of consolidation in which a fairly small number > of people have a very large number of dependent customers. > Unfortuantely, whereas mail is asynchronous, DNS is effectively > synchronous: if the provder has a bad day and you can't get an > answer the site is down. > This means that customers want to have multiple different vendors > as their master, and they want the secondaries of those sources to > offer as much as possible the same features, even when various DNS > Tricks are in use; and they want the downstreams to be using > standard protocols. The more we can make interoperate to support > that, the better off those users are. >
Hi Andrew, Thanks for the feedback and support! Thanks, John > > Best regards, > > A > > -- > Andrew Sullivan > a...@anvilwalrusden.com -- THESE ARE THE DROIDS TO WHOM I REFER: This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
